Antipope Paul VI with Breast-Plate Jewish High Priest
" While Jesus was still speaking, Judas, one of the Twelve, came. With him was a large crowd carrying swords and clubs. They had been sent by the chief priests and elders of the people. His betrayer had given them a sign: “Arrest the man I kiss.” Just then he came to Jesus and said, “Hello, Rabbi.” Then he kissed him. But Jesus said to him, “Friend, do what you came to do.” Then they came and grabbed Jesus and arrested him. " (Matthew 26:47-50)
" And Jesus said to him: " Judas, dost thou betray the Son of man with a kiss? " (Luke 22:48)
Behold, How Montini (Antipope Paul VI) kept out Papal Tiara from Vatican and worn the Jewish Breast-Plate as Betrayal to the Church as what Judas did it to Lord Jesus?
Antipope Paul VI aka Montini removed Papal Tiara and kept out it from Papal Throne.
It signs that Paul VI betrayed the Church (with removal of Papal Tiara which symbolizes St. Peter's Throne) and replaced it with Modern Pharisees who rejected Lord Jesus and His Church like following this images :
In the book of Exodus and the Book of Leviticus, Ephod is described as being created for the High Priest to wear as part of his official vestments (Exodus 28:4+, 29:5, 39:2+; Leviticus 8:7). Ephod contained 12 stones which portraits 12 Israeli Tribes. Ephod was used for the Last time by Caiaphas who rejected Jesus as Messiah, The Son of God.
Montini was a supporter of Masonic ideas and a friend of Freemasonry, which was repeatedly condemned by the Catholic Popes many times.
The Grand Master of the Masonry, Gamberini on the day Montini was elected to be an Antipope, stated:
"Here is the man we need!"
Carlo Falconi wrote in one of his books:
" I would add that the information I received from a certain 33 degree – also credible – that Montini was always enrolled in a Masonic Lodge … "
Antipope Paul VI with Anti-Patriarch Athenagoras I
During his journey to the Holy Land (in 1964), Antipope Paul VI kissed on the Mount of Olives, the Greek Schismatic "Patriarch" Athenagoras I, Freemason of the 33 degree. Then, on the eve of the closing of Vatican II Council, the pair lifted the mutual “excommunications” launched in 1054.
Antipope Paul VI and U'Thant, Secretary General of UN (notes: United Nations is a part of Illuminati Propaganda and Masonic Organization)
Later on, Paul VI would give his “pastoral” and his “ring” to the Burmese Pagan Buddhist U’thant, Secretary General of the UN.
“How could a successor of Peter have caused in so short a time more damage to the Church than the Revolution of 1789?... the deepest and most excessive in Her history… what no heresiarch has ever succeeded in doing?... Do we really have a pope or an intruder sitting on the Chair of Peter?” (Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, commenting on Paul VI’s reign in 1976)
In the first speech of the Vatican II Council, the Paul VI adopted the principle of “modernist heresy”:
" Neque opus nostrum, quasi ad finem primarium, eo spectat, ut de quibusdam capitibus praecipuis doctrinae ecclesiasticae disceptetur, sed potius ut ea ratione pervestigetur et exponantur, quam tempora postulant nostra."
The essence of this statement is as follows:
" Above all, this Christian doctrine be studied and exposed through the forms of literary investigation and formulation of contemporary thoughts. "
The “principle” enunciated by Antipope Paul VI, on the contrary, becomes the negation of that of the Apostolic Tradition, which wanna be needed by God, and it reverses the Magisterium of the Catholic Church.
He putted on the teacher’s desk, in place of “Revealing God” and of the “Teaching Church”, the method of man’s autonomous investigation and the formulation of a purely human and arbitrary doctrine, peculiar to the philosophical-literary style of modern man – therefore, of the man of all ages, mutable with the times – oblivious that only the “truth” revealed by God is the sole immutable and eternal truth.
This “principle” is unquestionably a heresy against the centuries-old Magisterium of the Catholic Church.
It takes the place of the “dogmatic” principle, alone to offer proof and certainty of the “Catholic truth”.
The teaching Catholic Church has always taught that the “reason of believing” does not lean at all upon scientific conquests, achieved through man’s intellect, for the “reason of believing” rests exclusively upon the Authority of Revealing God and upon that of the Supreme Magisterium of the Catholic Church, which received from Jesus Christ the mandate to teach it officially and in an infallible manner.
In a further speech, Antipope Paul VI declares that the Vatican II Antichurch “declared himself as a Servant of Humanity”:
" Aliud est etiam, quod consideratione dignum putamus: hujus modi divitem doctrinae copiam, eo unice spectare, ut homini serviat. "
" … All this doctrinal wealth points but to one direction: to serve man. "
Anti-Pope Paul VI celebrated Novus Ordo Invalid Protestant Mass which oriented to serve Man, not to God Himself.
Novus Ordo Missae, pleased for humans.
Novus Ordo is Lutheran Mass
The Vatican II Antichurch declares himself a “servant of man” and gives him honor in his cult.
So, exactly the opposite of the Catholic Church, which is always the model of the Blessed Virgin Mary (Ancilla Domini), declares herself a Servant of the Lord God and reveals his honor to Him.
On September 14, 1965, antipope Paul VI said:
Could the Church, could we but look upon him (man) and love him? The Council is a solemn act of love toward humanity. May Christ assist us so that it be truly so.
All his writings and speeches give grounds for asserting that the center of his love was not God, but man. He always referred to him, he was guided by his judgments and actions.
This cult of man leads in a straight line to the equality myth of all people – hence the equation of “classes” as well as “universal democracy”, which is nothing more than Masonic universalism repeatedly condemned by the Catholic Popes.
At the last public Session of the Vatican II Council, the antipope Paul VI made “profession of faith” of the antichurch:
" The Church of the Council – said he – has much focused on man, man as he really is today: living man, man all wrapped up in himself, man who makes himself not only the center of his every interest but dares to claim that he is the principle and explanation of all reality … Secular humanism, revealing itself in its horrible anti-clerical reality has, in a certain sense, defied the Council. The religion of the God who became man has met the religion of man who makes himself God. (…) But we call upon those who term themselves modern humanists, and who have renounced the transcendent value of the highest realities, to give the Council credit at least for one quality and to recognize our own new type of humanism: we, too, in fact, we more than any others, honor mankind; We have cult of man! "
Cult of Man was condemned by God as Idolatry :
Thus saith the Lord: “Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the Lord”. (Jeremiah 17:5)
And the Holy Angel who was servant of God who has holiness, rejected if he want to be worshipped as deity like many Pagans worship false gods like deities :
But the angel said, “Don't do that! I am a servant, just like you and everyone else who tells about Jesus. Don't worship anyone but God. Everyone who tells about Jesus does it by the power of the Spirit.” (Revelations 19:10)
Paul VI, General Audience, Dec. 6, 1972: “Does God exist? Who is God? And what knowledge can man have of him? What relationship must each of us have with him? To answer each of these questions would lead us to endless and complex discussions…” (Source : L’Osservatore Romano (the Vatican’s Newspaper))
These questions don’t lead us to endless and complex discussions. Does God exist? Yes. Who is God? The Holy Trinity. What knowledge can man have of him? The Catholic Faith. What relationship must each of us have with him? To belong to the Church He established. Paul VI is stating that these are endless and complex questions. No Catholic would assert such nonsense, which mocks and renders meaningless the Catholic Faith and the true God.Paul VI, General Audience, June 27, 1973: “…everything must change, everything must progress. Evolution seems to be the law that brings liberation. There must be a great deal that is true and good in this mentality…” (Source : L’Osservatore Romano (the Vatican’s Newspaper))
Here Paul VI explicitly states and approves the Modernist blasphemy that everything is in a state of evolution. His heresy was explicitly condemned by Pope St. Pius X:Pope St. Pius X, Pascendi (# 26), Sept. 8, 1907, explaining the doctrine of the Modernists: “To the laws of evolution everything is subject – dogma, Church, worship, the Books we revere as sacred, even faith itself…”
The Catholic Church teaches that all non-Catholic religions are false and way to the Hell. There is only one true Church, outside of which no one can be saved. This is Catholic dogma.
Pope St. Gregory The Great
Pope St. Gregory the Great, 590-604: “The holy universal Church teaches that it is not possible to worship God truly except in her and asserts that all who are outside of her will not be saved.”
All of the other religions belong to the Devil. This is the teaching of Jesus Christ, the Catholic Church and Sacred Scripture. See 1 Cor. 10:20 and Psalm 95:5. Anyone who shows esteem for non-Christian religions, or regards them as good or deserving of respect, denies Jesus Christ and is an apostate.Paul VI, General Audience, Nov. 8, 1972: “Ecumenism began in this way; as respect for non-Christian religions…”
That statement above was Condemned by Pope Pius XI :
Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos (# 2), Jan. 6, 1928: “…that false opinion which considers all religions to be more or less good and praiseworthy... Not only are those who hold this opinion in error and deceived, but also in distorting the idea of true religion they reject it...”
Here is more of what Paul VI thought about non-Christian religions of the Devil:Paul VI, Address, Sept. 22, 1973: “…noble non-Christian religions…”
This is apostasy – a total rejection of Jesus Christ.Paul VI, General Audience, Jan. 12, 1972: “…a disconcerting picture opens up before our eyes: that of religions, the religions invented by man; attempts that are sometimes extremely daring and noble…”
Here Paul VI says that religions invented by man are sometimes extremely noble! This is apostasy – a rejection of Jesus Christ and the Catholic Faith.Paul VI, Message, Dec. 6, 1977: “…non-Christian religions, which the Church respects and esteems…”
He is saying that he esteems false religions.Paul VI, Message, Nov. 24, 1969: “…overcome divisions, by developing a mutual respect between the different religious confessions.” Paul VI, Address, Dec. 3, 1970: “We greet with respect the representatives of all the other religions who have honored us by their presence.” Paul VI, General Audience, July 6, 1977: “We welcome with sincere respect the Japanese delegation of the Konko-kyo religion.” In his Address, Aug. 22, 1969, Paul VI praised the Hindu Gandhi, and stated that he was: “Ever conscious of God’s presence…”
Hindus are pagans and idolaters who worship many different false gods. For Paul VI to praise the notorious Hindu Gandhi as “ever-conscious of God’s presence” shows again that Paul VI was a complete religious indifferentist. Paul VI also officially praised the false religion of Hinduism in the official Vatican II document Nostra Aetate #2 (on non-Christian religions), as we quoted in the section on Vatican II.
Paul VI, Apostolic Exhortation, Dec. 8, 1975: “The Church respects and esteems these non-Christian religions…”
Notice again that Paul VI esteems false religions; this is satanic.
Paul VI, Address, Aug. 24, 1974: “Religious and cultural differences in India, as you have said, are honored and respected… We are pleased to see that this mutual honor and esteem is practiced…”
Paul VI says that religious differences are honored in India and that he is pleased to see this. This means that he honors the worship of false gods.
Paul VI, Address to Synod of Bishops, Sept. 2, 1974: “Likewise we cannot omit a reference to the non-Christian religions. These, in fact, must no longer be regarded as rivals, or obstacles to Evangelization…”
Buddhism is a false, pagan religion of the East which teaches belief in re-incarnation and karma. Buddhists hold that life is not worth living, and that every form of conscious existence is an evil. Some Buddhists, according to some denominations, worship various false gods, although Buddhism itself is Non-Theistic. Buddhism is an idolatrous and false religion of the Devil. Here’s what Paul VI thought about Buddhism:
Paul VI, General Audience to Japanese Buddhists, Sept. 5, 1973: “It is a great pleasure for us to welcome the members of the Japanese Buddhists Europe Tour, honored followers of the Soto-shu sect of Buddhism… At the Second Vatican Council the Catholic Church exhorted her sons and daughters to study and evaluate the religious traditions of mankind and to ‘learn by sincere and patient dialogue what treasures a bountiful God has distributed among the nations of the earth’ (Ad Gentes, 11)… Buddhism is one of the riches of Asia…”
According to Paul VI, the false, pagan and idolatrous religion of Buddhism is one of the “riches” of Asia!Paul VI, General Audience to Japanese Buddhist Mission Tour, Oct. 24, 1973: “Once again it is our pleasure to welcome a distinguished group of the Japan Buddhist Mission Tour. We are happy to reiterate the esteem we have for your country, your noble traditions…” Paul VI, Speech to Tibetan Buddhist Spiritual Leader, Jan. 17, 1975: “The Second Vatican Council has expressed sincere admiration for Buddhism in its various forms… We wish Your Holiness and all your faithful an abundance of Prosperity and Peace.”
Notice his idolatry and apostasy in admiring, not only Buddhists, but the false religion of Buddhism.Paul VI, Address to Buddhists, June 5, 1972: “It is with great cordiality and esteem that we greet so distinguished a group of Buddhist leaders from Thailand... We have a profound regard for… your precious traditions.”
Paul VI to a group of Buddhist Leaders, June 15, 1977: “To the distinguished group of Buddhist leaders from Japan we bid a warm welcome. The Second Vatican Council declared that the Catholic Church looks with sincere respect on your way of life… "Paul VI, Address to Buddhist Patriarch of Laos, June 8, 1973: “… Buddhism… the Catholic Church considers its spiritual riches with esteem and respect and wishes to collaborate with you, as religious men, to bring about real peace and the salvation of man.” (Source: L’Osservatore Romano (the Vatican’s Newspaper))
Paul VI says that the Catholic Church considers with esteem the spiritual riches of the false religion of Buddhism. He then says that he wishes to collaborate with the Buddhist Patriarch to bring about the salvation of man! This is not only heresy and apostasy, but is also a polytheism. ( For more info about How Catholic Church fought against Paganism and Heathenism, please read it : https://romancatholictraditional.blogspot.com/2024/11/catholic-church-against-idolatry-and.html?m=1 )
Mahometanism is a false religion which denies the Divinity of Christ and rejects the Most Holy Trinity. Besides rejecting the true God, Saracens allow polygamy up to four wives, and its followers (Saracens) spread this false religion with a zeal unequalled by the others. Mahometanism is the most viciously anti-Christian major false religion in the world. To convert to Christianity in many Islamic countries means death. The propagation of the true Faith is strictly prohibited by the Saracens. " Islamic society " is one of the most evil things in human history. Here is what Paul VI thought about this false religion which rejects Christ and the Trinity:
Paul VI, Speech, Sept. 9, 1972: “We would also like you to know that the Church recognizes the riches of the Islamic faith – a faith that binds us to the one God.”
Paul VI speaks about the “riches” of the Islamic Faith, a “Faith” that rejects Jesus Christ and the Trinity. He says this “Faith” binds us to the One God. This is apostasy.
Paul VI, Address, Sept. 18, 1969: “…Moslems… along with us adore the one and merciful God, who on the last day will judge mankind.”
Saracens don’t worship the one true God, the Holy Trinity, together with Catholics, as we covered in the section on the heresies of Vatican II. To assert that Saracens do worship the same God as Catholics is heresy. And Saracens certainly don’t worship God who will judge mankind on the last day, Jesus Christ. (For more info How Catholic Church fought against Mahometanism, please read it : https://romancatholictraditional.blogspot.com/2025/03/catholic-church-has-fought-against.html?m=1 )
Paul VI, Address to Saracen Ambassador, June 4, 1976: “... Moroccan Moslems … our brothers in faith in the one God. You will always be made very welcome and you will find esteem and understanding here.” ((Source : L’Osservatore Romano (the Vatican’s Newspaper))
He says that Saracens are brothers in the Faith. This is apostasy. He then says that Mahometans will always find esteem at the Vatican.
Paul VI, Address, Dec. 2, 1977: “…the Moslems (who) profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day, as the Second Vatican Council solemnly declared.”
Paul VI, Address, August, 1969: “…Our lively desire to greet, in your persons, the great Moslem communities spread throughout Africa? You thus enable Us to manifest here Our high respect for the faith you profess… In recalling the Catholic and Anglican Martyrs, We gladly recall also those confessors of the Moslem faith who were the first to suffer death…”
He mentions his high respect for the false faith of Mahometanism, and he commemorates Saracens who witnessed to this false religion through death. This is total apostasy.
Paul VI, Angelus Address, Aug. 3, 1969: “Twenty-two martyrs were recognized, but there were many more, and not only Catholics. There were also Anglicans and some Mohammedans.”
This is probably the most scandalous statement we’ve ever seen regarding the heresy that there are non-Catholic martyrs. Paul VI says that Saracens (who don’t even believe in Christ or the Trinity) are martyrs, in addition to Anglicans. This is truly amazing and totally heretical.
Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, 1441, ex cathedra: “….nobody can be saved, no matter how much he has given away in alms and even if he has shed blood in the name of Christ, unless he has persevered in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church.”
Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, dogmatic Athanasian Creed, 1439: “Whoever wishes to be saved, needs above all to hold the Catholic faith; unless each one preserves this whole and inviolate, he will without a doubt perish in eternity…”
Paul VI, Address, July 9, 1969: “She [the Church] has also affirmed, during Her long history, at the cost of oppression and persecution, freedom for everyone to profess his own religion. No one, She says, is to be restrained from acting, no one is to be forced to act in a manner contrary to his own beliefs… As we said, the Council demanded a true and public religious freedom…”
This is completely false and heretical. The Catholic Church has affirmed during her long history, at the cost of oppression and persecution, that the religion of Jesus Christ is the only one that is true; and that Christ is truly God and truly man. Paul VI would have us believe, however, that the martyrs were tortured horribly, not for their profession of faith in Christ, but in order for all to have freedom to profess their various false religions! This is an astoundingly heretical distortion of the truth!Paul VI, Message, Dec. 10, 1973: “… the repeated violations of the sacred right to religious liberty in its various aspects and the absence of an international agreement supporting this right…”
Paul VI, Letter, July 25, 1975: “…the Holy See rejoices to see specifically emphasized the right of religious liberty.”
That statements above were Condemned by Pope Leo XIII on Libertas #19 and #21:
" To make this more evident, the growth of liberty ascribed to our age must be considered apart in its various details. And, first, let us examine that liberty in individuals which is so opposed to the virtue of religion, namely, the liberty of worship, as it is called. This is based on the principle that every man is free to profess as he may choose any religion or none.
.......Wherefore, civil society must acknowledge God as its Founder and Parent, and must obey and reverence His power and authority. Justice therefore forbids, and reason itself forbids, the State to be godless; or to adopt a line of action which would end in godlessness-namely, to treat the various religions (as they call them) alike, and to bestow upon them promiscuously equal rights and privileges. Since, then, the profession of one religion is necessary in the State, that religion must be professed which alone is true, and which can be recognized without difficulty, especially in Catholic States, because the marks of truth are, as it were, engravers upon it. This religion, therefore, the rulers of the State must preserve and protect, if they would provide - as they should do - with prudence and usefulness for the good of the community. For public authority exists for the welfare of those whom it governs; and, although its proximate end is to lead men to the prosperity found in this life, yet, in so doing, it ought not to diminish, but rather to increase, man's capability of attaining to the supreme good in which his everlasting happiness consists: which never can be attained if religion be disregarded. "
The Byzantine Schismatics who claim themselves as "Eastern Orthodox" are schismatics who reject Papal Infallibility and the last 13 General Councils of the Catholic Church. They reject that the Holy Ghost proceeds from the Second Person of the Trinity; they permit divorce and remarriage; and many of them reject the Immaculate Conception. Here’s what Paul VI thought of these schismatics:Paul VI, Speech, April 19, 1970, speaking of the deceased schismatic Patriarch of Moscow: “To the very end he was conscious and solicitous for his great ministry.”
He says that leadership in a schismatic church is a great ministry.Paul VI, Address, Jan. 24, 1972: “…greet among us an eminent representative of the venerable Orthodox Church… a man of great piety...” Paul VI, Speech, Jan. 23, 1972: “…the great, venerable and excellent Orthodox Patriarch…” Paul VI, Address to Schismatic Delegation, June 27, 1977: “Then, ten years later, we paid a visit to your holy Church…” Paul VI, General Audience, Jan. 20, 1971: “… the venerable Eastern Orthodox Churches…”
He says that Byzantine schismatic churches are venerable.Paul VI, speaking of the death of the Schismatic Patriarch Athenagoras, July 9, 1972: “…we recommend this great man to you, a man of a venerated Church…” Paul VI, Address, May 25, 1968: “…the venerable Orthodox Church of Bulgaria.” Paul VI, Common Declaration with Patriarch of Syrian Schismatic Sect, Oct. 27, 1971: “This should be done with love, with openness to the promptings of the Holy Spirit, and with mutual respect for each other and each other’s Church.” (For more info How Byzantine Schismatics were emerged, Please read it and How Catholic Church disputed their errors: https://romancatholictraditional.blogspot.com/2025/05/why-west-east-schism-could-be-happened.html?m=1 )
Paul VI, Letter, March 7, 1971, regarding the death of two schismatic patriarchs: “…moved by the death of His Holiness Patriarch Kyrillos VI we express our sincere sympathy with assurance of our prayers for the eternal repose of your beloved pastor and for God’s consoling blessing on the entire Coptic Orthodox Church.”
Paul VI says that he will pray for the soul of the deceased schismatic, indicating that the deceased non-Catholic patriarch can be saved, which is heretical. Second, he calls for God’s consoling blessing on the entire Coptic Myaphisite Church. How about that there is only one true Church and that the Coptic Schismatic Church is not part of it? How about God’s grace of conversion for the Coptic Myaphisites to the true Church? Paul VI’s statement shows again that he held heretical sects to be true Churches, and the Catholic Faith to be meaningless. As we know, Coptic Schismatics were Myaphisites who were condemned by Council of Chalcedon 451 and whoever held to Non-Chalcedonian Sect, they are Schismatics. (For more know about it and How Catholic Church condemns Monophysite and anathematized Euthykes and also Anti-Patriarch Dioscorus of Alexandria, please read it : https://romancatholictraditional.blogspot.com/2024/11/council-of-chalcedon-451-citation.html?m=1 )
From conclusion above we can get from what Second Vatican Council taught about Byzantine Schismatics, Non-Chalcedonian Schismatics, and then East Assyrian Sect Nestorian :
" 17. What has just been said about the lawful variety that can exist in the Church must also be taken to apply to the differences in theological expression of doctrine. In the study of revelation East and West have followed different methods, and have developed differently their understanding and confession of God's truth. It is hardly surprising, then, if from time to time one tradition has come nearer to a full appreciation of some aspects of a mystery of revelation than the other, or has expressed it to better advantage. In such cases, these various theological expressions are to be considered often as mutually complementary rather than conflicting. Where the authentic theological traditions of the Eastern Church are concerned, we must recognize the admirable way in which they have their roots in Holy Scripture, and how they are nurtured and given expression in the life of the liturgy. They derive their strength too from the living tradition of the apostles and from the works of the Fathers and spiritual writers of the Eastern Churches. Thus they promote the right ordering of Christian life and, indeed, pave the way to a full vision of Christian truth...... " (Unitatis Redintegratio No. 17, Second Vatican Council)
Condemned by Pope Gregory XVI and Pope Eugene IV.
Pope Gregory XVI, May 27, 1832: “Be not deceived, my brother; if anyone follows a schismatic, he will not attain the inheritance of the kingdom of God.”
Council of Ferrara-Florence (1431-1449) :
" In this, those utterly pernicious men, masking their malice with the rosy colour of a truth of the faith, gave to the council of Constance an evil and mischievous meaning completely opposed to its true teaching, imitating in this the teaching of other schismatics and heretics who always amass for their support fabricated errors and impious dogmas drawn from their perverse interpretation of the divine scriptures and the holy fathers.
Finally, completely perverting their mind and turning away their eyes from looking to heaven or remembering righteous judgments, after the manner of Dioscorus and the infamous synod of Ephesus, they proceeded to a declaratory sentence of deprivation, as they claimed, from the dignity and office of the supreme apostolate, a poisonous and execrable pronouncement involving an unforgivable crime. Here we will take the tenor of that sentence, abhorrent to every pious mind, as sufficiently expressed. They omitted nothing, as far as was in their power, that might overthrow this incomparable good of union.......
Also, we decree and declare that all of the aforesaid persons have been and are schismatics and heretics, And that as such they are assuredly to be punished with suitable penalties over and above the penalties imposed at the aforesaid council of Ferrara, together with all their supporters and abettors, of whatever ecclesiastical or secular status, condition or rank they may be, even cardinals, patriarchs, archbishops, bishops or abbots or those of any other dignity, so that they may receive their deserts with the aforesaid Korah, Dathan and Abiram Let nobody therefore … ...... It firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the catholic church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the catholic church before the end of their lives; that the unity of the ecclesiastical body is of such importance that only for those who abide in it do the church’s sacraments contribute to salvation and do fasts, almsgiving and other works of piety and practices of the Christian militia produce eternal rewards; and that nobody can be saved, no matter how much he has given away in alms and even if he has shed his blood in the name of Christ, unless he has persevered in the bosom and the unity of the catholic church. "
Paul VI favored birth control :
Paul VI, Speech, Nov. 16, 1970: “…this, among other effects, will undoubtedly favor a rational control of birth by couples…”
Paul VI, Address, Aug. 24, 1969: “…the liberty of husband and wife and does not forbid them a moral and reasonable limitation of birth…”
Paul VI, Humanae Vitae (No. 16), July 25, 1968: “It cannot be denied that in each case the married couple, for acceptable reasons, are both perfectly clear in their intention to avoid children and wish to make sure that none will result.”
Paul VI says in Humanae Vitae that couples are perfectly free to have zero children if they want to.
United Nations, Masonic Organization Symbolizes Illuminati Control over the World
The United Nations is an evil masonic organization that promotes contraception and abortion, and looks to take control of the decision-making for every country on the planet. Former UN Secretary General U Thant praised the Jewish-Communist Lenin as a man whose “ideals were reflected in the United Nations Charter.”
Here’s what Paul VI thought of the UN:
Paul VI, Address, Feb. 5, 1972: “…we have faith in the UN.”
Paul VI, Message, April 26, 1968: “…may all men of heart join together peacefully in order that the principles of the United Nations may be not only proclaimed, but put into effect, and that not only the constitution of States may promulgate them, but public authorities apply them…”
Paul VI, Address to Secretary General of the U.N., July 9, 1977: “We wish to listen to the voice of the authorized representative of the United Nations Organization… all this merely emphasizes more the beneficial and irreplaceable role of the United Nations Organization…”
Paul VI, Message to U.N., Oct. 4, 1970: “Today we wish once more to repeat the words which we had the honor to pronounce on 4th October 1965 from the tribune of your assembly: ‘This Organization represents the path that has to be taken for modern civilization and for world peace… Where else, moreover, could these governments and peoples better find a bridge to link them, a table round which they can gather, and a tribunal where they may plead the cause of justice and peace?... who better than the United Nations Organization and its specialized agencies will be able to take up the challenge presented to all mankind?... There exists in effect a common good of man, and it is up to your Organization, because of its dedication to universality, which is its reason for being, to promote it untiringly.”
First, Paul VI says that the U.N. is the path that has to be taken. He says that the U.N., not the Catholic Church, is the best means for the cause of justice and peace for the world. Second, he says that the U.N. is the universal (that is, Catholic) body for mankind! He is replacing the Church with the UN.
Paul VI, Message to President of a U.N. Conference, May, 1976: “…this new international economic order that has to be ceaselessly built up.”
Paul VI, Message, Sept. 8, 1977: “Stress is legitimately laid nowadays on the necessity of constructing a new world order...”
Paul VI, Message to United Nations, May 24, 1978: “…we are aware that the path which must lead to the coming of a new international order… cannot in any case be as short as we would like it to be… Disarmament, a new world order and development are three obligations that are inseparably bound together…”
New World Order, by Illuminati and Freemasonry Propagandist. This is not surprised that Antipope Paul VI made an Invalid Mass with same name, New Order Mass or Novus Ordo Missae. Novus Ordo Missae name was taken from Novus Ordo Seclorum, it meaning that to serve Man.
Antipope Paul VI and Protestants :
Antipope Paul VI with 6 Protestant Ministers who composed for Novus Ordo Missae and New Rites of Ordination for Priesthood
Paul VI posing with six Protestant theologians who were part of the commission encharged with writing the New Mass. These Protestants were invited by Paul VI in order to make sure that nothing in the New Mass would shock their heresy. It is not surprising that the resulting Novus Ordo Mass has the flavor of Protestantism, which means the taste of heresy.
Paul VI, Speech to Representatives of non-Catholic churches in Geneva, June, 1969: “The spirit that animates us… This spirit lays down, as the first basis of every fruitful contact between different confessions, that each profess his faith loyally.”
Paul VI, Letter, Aug. 6, 1973, to the World Council of Churches: “The World Council of Churches has been created in order, by the grace of God, to serve the Churches and Ecclesial Communities in their endeavors to restore and to manifest to all that perfect communion in faith and love which is the gift of Christ to His Church.”
Paul VI says that this is manifested by the World Council of Churches! He has replaced the Catholic Church with the World Council of Churches. The World Council of Churches is an organization made up of many different sects and denominations. A traditional commentator would correctly label it a Communist front group – meant to water-down and liberalize the “Christian” churches of the world. But it is undoubtedly a very heretical ecumenical organization made of various man-made religions.
Paul VI, Discourse, Dec. 12, 1968: “…our sons are on friendly terms with their Christian brothers, Lutheran Evangelicals…”
Pope Pius IV, profession of faith, Council of Trent, ex cathedra: “This true Catholic faith, outside of which no one can be saved… I now profess and truly hold…”
Paul VI, Address, April 28, 1977: “…relations between the Catholic Church and the Anglican Communion… these words of hope, ‘The Anglican Communion united not absorbed,’ are no longer a mere dream.”
This means that Paul VI wants to unite with the Anglican sect without absorbing them; that is, without converting them. Not only that, with other words, it influenced the development about New Rites of Ordination and Consecration for Priesthood and Episcopacy in Novus Ordo Church. New Rites of Ordination was made on 8 June 1968. This is Invalid Sacrament for Ordination of Priests and Consecration of Bishops. (For more know about Anglicanism and Did Anglican Ordination was finally said as Invalid, please read it : https://romancatholictraditional.blogspot.com/2025/05/history-of-anglican-heretic-sect.html?m=1 )
Paul VI, Speech, Aug. 2, 1969: “We wished to meet the Anglican Church which flourishes in this country. We wished to pay homage to those sons of whom it is most proud, those who – together with our own Catholic martyrs – gave the generous witness of their lives to the Gospel...”
Pope Gregory XVI, May 27, 1832: “Finally some of these misguided people attempt to persuade themselves and others that men are not saved only in the Catholic religion, but that even heretics may attain eternal life.”
Antipope Paul VI with sorcery stick which's blasphemy to Crucifix
Paul VI was the man who claimed to be the head of the Catholic Church from June 21, 1963 to August 6, 1978. He was the man who promulgated the Second Vatican Council and the New Mass. We’ve already seen that the evidence indicates that the man who preceded and elevated Paul VI, John XXIII, was a Freemason and a manifest heretic. We’ve also seen that the documents of Vatican II contain many heresies, and that the New Mass, which Paul VI eventually promulgated, represented a liturgical revolution. Paul VI solemnly ratified all 16 documents of Vatican II. It is not possible for a true pope of the Catholic Church to solemnly ratify teachings that are heretical. As we will show in more detail later in this book, the fact that Paul VI did solemnly ratify the heretical teachings of Vatican II proves that Paul VI was not a true pope, but an antipope. It’s important to keep in mind that Paul VI was the one who gave the world the New Mass, the other new “sacraments,” and the heretical teachings of Vatican II. If you go to the New Mass or embrace the teachings of Vatican II, the confidence that you have that these things are legitimate is directly connected to the confidence that you have that Paul VI was a true Catholic pope.
In addition to all of the heresies we have covered in the speeches of Paul VI, he was the man who authoritatively implemented the false Second Vatican Council, changed the Catholic Mass into a Protestant service, and changed the rite of every single Sacrament. He changed the matter or form of the Eucharist, Extreme Unction, Holy Orders, and Confirmation. Paul VI wanted to put Christ to death in the Mass (by removing it and replacing it with a counterfeit), and wanted to kill His Catholic Church by attempting to change the Church completely. Within two years of the close of Vatican II, Paul VI removed the index of forbidden books, a decision one commentator rightly called “incomprehensible.”
In the Apocalypse, chapters 17 and 18, there is predicted that a whore will arise in the last days from the city of seven hills, which is Rome. This whore will tread upon the blood of the martyrs and saints. This whore is clearly contrasted with the immaculate bride of Christ, the Catholic Church. In other words, the whore of Babylon will be a false church from Rome that will appear in the last days. Near the end of this book we bring forward the evidence that the Whore of Babylon is the Vatican II sect, a false bride which arises in Rome in the last days in order to deceive the Catholic Faithful.In her appearance at La Salette, France, Sept. 19, 1846, the Blessed Mother predicted: “Rome will lose the Faith and become the seat of the Anti-Christ… the Church will be in eclipse.”
In the following quote, Antipope Paul VI essentially admits that his new Church is this false Church by admitting that his “Church” has thrown off its opposition to the world, which characterizes the true Church.Paul VI, General Audience, Oct. 1, 1969: “On the other hand, She [the Church] is also trying to adapt herself and assimilate herself to the world’s ways; She is taking off her distinctive sacral garment, for She wants to feel more human and earthly. “She is tending to let herself be absorbed by the social and temporal milieu. She has almost been seized by human respect at the thought that She is different in some way and obliged to have a style of thought and life which is not that of the world. She is undergoing the world’s changes and degradations with conformist, almost avante-garde zeal.”
Theses following from what Paul VI convoked about Invalid Sacraments :
Invalid Priesthood from New Rites, with Protestant Table
Not only Olive Oil, but Vegetables Oil and then Paraffin can be used for Chrismation, this is rule which was convoked by Antipope Paul VI
Regarding the form and matter of the sacraments that were changed, will be explained in another post.
But this is the face of Evil Antipope Paul VI with the various crimes he committed against the Catholic Church.
Satanic Paul VI Heritages :
Antipope Paul VI Audience Hall
Antipope Paul VI Surprised many Clergy in Vatican about Satan's smoke which that smoke was came from himself as Satanic Infiltrator
Reversed Antipope Paul VI Signature
Satanic Sorcery stick
The “bent cross” ferula, or staff, which is a hideous rendition of a crucifix, shows our Lord’s legs immodestly spread apart and shows the cross bars bent, rather than straight. That following photo above shows that this “crucifix” is repulsive indeed, dishonors Christ, and does not inspire pious thoughts. This sinister-looking cross was designed by Italian Lello Scorzelli (1921-1997) during — you guessed it — the 1960s and was introduced — you guessed it again — by "Pope"Paul VI (Giovanni Battista Montini), who used it for the first time at the closing of his modernist robber synod known as the “Second Vatican Council”, on December 8, 1965. In fact, in 1963 Antipope Paul VI had given Scorzelli a permanent job in Rome to design this and other “art” for the Vatican. The blasphemous Scorzelli cross bears some striking resemblance to the the crucifix drawn by Belgian “artist” Albert Servaes (d. 1966) as part of his “stations of the cross”, which were condemned by the Church in 1921 under Pope Benedict XV.
On September 11, 1670, under Pope Clement X, the Holy Office prohibited the making of crucifixes “in a form so coarse and artless, in an attitude so indecent, with features so distorted by grief that they provoke disgust rather than pious attention” (quoted by Jacques Maritain, Speech to Journées d’Art Religieux, Feb. 23, 1924). The reason for this prohibition has never been more obvious than now, now that the Vatican II Church has spent decades disregarding this decree and has commissioned, promoted, allowed, and tolerated the foulest modernistic displays of religious “art” around the world.
In addition, the indecent Scorzelli crucifix also has something in common with the heretical crucifixes of the Jansenists:
Jansenist Crucifix
The so-called “Jansenist Crucifix” is defined as a “crucifix in which the arms of our Lord are not extended at right angles with His sacred body, but are contractedly suspended from the cross-beam parallel with the upright portion of the cross. The symbolism of the outstretched arms is that Christ died for all men; that of the Jansenist crucifix, that Christ died only for the elect” (Frederick George Lee, A Glossary of Liturgical and Ecclesiastical Terms, s.v. “Crucifix, Jansenist” [London: Bernard Quaritch, 1877], p. 103). (This is not to be confused with the “for many” vs. “for all” issue in the Canon of the Mass – the Catechism of the Council of Trent clarifies: “…if we look to its value, we must confess that the Redeemer shed His blood for the salvation of all; but if we look to the fruit which mankind have received from it, we shall easily find that it pertains not unto all, but to many of the human race”.)
When Paul VI died in 1978, his successor Antipope John Paul I retained the ferula, and then, Antipope John Paul II used it pehaps more frequently than anyone else. Antipope Benedict XVI used it as well, though not as often.
